The military, political and social importance of the castle in King Essay

The military, political and social importance of the castle in top executive Stephens reign - Essay caseown territories from the rivals, both Matilda supporters and Kings force started establishing fortifications on their own style of motte, bailey designs and fen-edge castles. Meanwhile in England both parties were compelled to keep armed forces permanently in strong castles, if necessary building new castles or increasing the fortifications of old ones.1 In the period of King Stephen various new fortifications were established and the breathing ones were reconstructed. Stone built castles played a major role in the military and political spheres of the country. Developments in castle-building certainly did not arise from the exigencies of fight but to provide an appropriate lordly residence go security, not terror, to dependents.2 Royal castles were built to bear on and mark the township and the forests while the distinguished castles were utilize by the lords in controll ing their widespread territories and estates. In addition, the authorities also excised power over baronial castles and placed restrictions on its construction. The baronial castles, of that time were considered as a threat to the public, due to their extensive control over the land and people, and so it was curbed by the monarchic authority by the castle policies and forfeitures. There was a distinct Angevin castle policy under which, by a careful strategy of building and forfeiture, the proportionality of princely to baronial castles was altered to enhance royal power over that of the aristocracy.3 It was during the period of King Stephen that these numerous castle building created a greater nuthouse to the social life of the people. The society was greatly affected with the castle-building of the powerful people. This included the adulterine castles that are so prominent both in... The researcher states that in the period of King Stephen various new fortifications were establ ished and the existing ones were reconstructed. Stone built castles played a major role in the military and political spheres of the country. Developments in castle-building certainly did not arise from the exigencies of war but to provide an appropriate lordly residence offering security, not terror, to dependents. Royal castles were built to maintain and control the township and the forests while the baronial castles were used by the lords in controlling their widespread territories and estates. In addition, the authorities also excised power over baronial castles and placed restrictions on its construction. The baronial castles, of that time were considered as a threat to the public, due to their extensive control over the land and people, and so it was curbed by the monarchic authority by the castle policies and forfeitures. There was a distinct Angevin castle policy under which, by a careful strategy of building and forfeiture, the ratio of royal to baronial castles was altere d to enhance royal power over that of the aristocracy. It was during the period of King Stephen that these numerous castle building created a greater chaos to the social life of the people. The society was greatly affected with the castle-building of the powerful people. This included the adulterine castles that are so prominent both in modern times as well as in the chronicles which is plausibly considered as the root of all the evils of the reign.